For the first time in nearly four decades, a senior intelligence official — not a secretive federal court — will have a decisive voice in whether Americans' communications can be monitored when they talk to foreigners overseas.
The new bill gives National Intelligence Director Mike McConnell and Attorney General Alberto Gonzales joint authority to approve the monitoring of such calls and e-mails, rather than the 11-member Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. Before the passage of the law, the President was in violation of the constitution, today it is the law. This action is no less a violation of separation of powers as was the Iraq War authorization.
This means an intelligence official is now empowered to sort through the legalistic, secretive world of FISA, rather than a judge or the nation's highest law enforcement officer. McConnell was added to the legal decision-making after lawmakers argued that the attorney general shouldn't hold the power alone. The spy chief's experience is largely in military intelligence, not legal matters. Oh, should we be thrilled that it is not Gonzalez alone? Are we supposed to be happy it is two people in the Executive branch (virtually and figuratively) instead of a court of law set-up to do such monitoring.
Civil liberties groups and some Democrats call the bill a vast expansion of government power. In the past several days, officials who work for McConnell, the Justice Department and the Republican congressional leadership have argued vehemently that that isn't so. Where the hell are they? Where is the outrage?
Lisa Graves of the Center for National Security Studies, which advocates for civil liberties, said the new law will potentially allow the government to intercept millions of Americans' calls and e-mails without warrants — as long as the NSA and other authorities have a foreign suspect in their sights. "This power that they have obtained is a dramatic expansion," she said.
The power may last longer than some people expect, Graves noted, thanks to a little-noticed provision of the bill. While the law expires in February unless Congress acts to extend it, any surveillance orders that are in place when it sunsets can last up to a full year, she said.
Without a repeal, lawmakers "weren't just giving them the power for six months. They were giving it to them for the rest of the administration," Graves said.
Without a repeal, lawmakers "weren't just giving them the power for six months. They were giving it to them for the rest of the administration," Graves said.
Make no mistake about it, this bill is a vast expansion of power. See talk left for more discussion and how a President with 25% approval rating can strong arm this Democratic Congress. I am disgusted.
3 comments:
K-Rad,
In case your readers were wondering why there was a big rush by the Bush administrations to revise the FISA rules, here is an article from yesterday's Washingtonpost.com.
\http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/02/AR2007080202619.html
The first paragraph essentially explains it nicely (below in quotes).
To me, it seems to follow this administration's tact of breaking the law first and then bullying the spineless congress into legitimizing their actions by altering the law itself.
" A federal intelligence court judge earlier this year secretly declared a key element of the Bush administration's wiretapping efforts illegal, according to a lawmaker and government sources, providing a previously unstated rationale for fevered efforts by congressional lawmakers this week to expand the president's spying powers."
I did not see that article. Fuckers. I heard about the rationale, but it makes it worse, doesn't it?
Over the past 6 years, this country has increasingly become akin to Oceania in "1984." And now we can no longer only blame Bush and his gang of thugs in the Executive - now we must blame the Democrats in Congress as well.
How in the world, with a Democratic majority in both the House and the Senate, does a bill like this get passed? How, after everything that has been uncovered about Alberto Gonzales' illegal actions, can he be placed in charge of this type of program?
Congress has severely abdicated its responsibilities and, sadly, it's probably because of Bush's threat to keep them in session instead of allowing them to take their month-long recess that was the impetus for such a passage. This is absolutely disgusting.
Post a Comment