Friday, November 16, 2007

Kill Your SUV (with the help of SF Appeals Court)


From the New York Times and NPR:


SAN FRANCISCO, Nov. 15 — A federal appeals court here rejected the Bush administration’s year-old fuel-economy standards for light trucks and sport utility vehicles on Thursday, saying that they were not tough enough because regulators had failed to thoroughly assess the economic impact of tailpipe emissions that contribute to climate change.
A three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in San Francisco, voided the new regulations for 2008-2011 model year vehicles and told the Transportation Department to produce new rules taking into account the value of reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
The court, siding with 4 environmental groups and 13 states and cities, also asked the government to explain why it still treated light trucks — which include pickups, sport utility vehicles and minivans — more mildly than passenger cars.


A sea change? "“What this says to me is that the courts are catching up with climate change and the law is catching up with climate change,” said Patrick A. Parenteau, an environmental law professor at Vermont Law School. “Climate change has ushered in a whole new era of judicial review.”


Could this lead to the potential demise of the SUV, which NPR reported is only used 30% of the time off-road? The case may go to the Supreme Court, or may be usurped by a Congressional bill that would raise efficiency levels to 35 m.p.g. Either way, the case has finally found a way to get the ball rolling to progress.

No comments: