Showing posts with label death penalty. Show all posts
Showing posts with label death penalty. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 5, 2007

New Jersey, the Death Penalty and Something Personal

Just minutes ago, Senate President Richard Codey announced that thefull Senate will vote on S-171, the death penalty abolition bill, THIS Monday, December 10 at 2PM.

That is the same day that the Assembly Law and Public Safety Committee will hear the Assembly version of the bill. That committee hearing starts at 10AM. The final vote would be in the Assembly on December 13, time to be decided.

Also see this recent article on NJ.com - A compelling case against the Death Penalty. Lesniak and Bateman make strong arguments against the death penalty, but they make policy arguments, not arguments laced in humanity.

Tomorrow I will drive to Hartford, Connecticut and testify in the penalty phase of a young man convicted of murder while the state of Connecticut holds his life in their hands. If the jury sentences him to death it will be the second person sentenced to death in 25 years. I knew this young man as a young boy, in a program for kids in foster care. I was the social worker. His mother was a drug addict, his father gone, raised by his grandmother and his aunt, his life was mired in poverty, violence, drugs. The Connecticut paper called him a "drifter" who murdered.

He is no drifter. He was in the Hartford Public schools, in the Connecticut foster care system, the criminal justice system, the mental health system. We knew him and we abandoned him just as we abandon so many in poverty, so many black kids on our streets. This young man is responsible for his actions, but so are we. I will have more on this after Friday.

Thursday, August 30, 2007

Kenneth Foster case on Democracy Now!

If you don't watch Democracy Now! you should. Here is the report regarding Kenneth Foster. He didn't kill anyone yet Texas will put him to death tonight.

Man Faces Execution Tonight in which All Agree He Did Not Kill Anyone

Where else? Texas. A man named Keneth Foster, 19 at the time in 1996 was up to no good in San Antonio the night of the crime. He was the driver for three other men comitting robbery. The shooter, Mariceo Brown, admitted to the killing and was executed last year. Brown, got out of the car. All the men agree there was never a discussion about killing anyone. Brown got out of the car to talk to a woman and got into an argument with Michael Lahood and shot him. According to reports Foster started to drive away, but the others in the car made him stop and waited for Brown until they all drove away.
The trial judge, the prosecutor, and the jury that sentenced Mr Foster to die admit that he did not murder the victim Michael LaHood. But, under a controversial "law of parties", in Texas an associate of a perpetrator can be found co-responsible in a capital case. The law imposes the death penalty on anybody involved in a crime where a murder occurred. This law is known as felony murder elsewhere.

Foster is a black man and the victim was white, the son of a prominent lawyer. The murder occurred as Foster was sitting in a car some 30 to 40 yards away with three other passengers – but prosecutors said there was a conspiracy to commit the crime and therefore he deserved a death sentence. Since Foster's original trial, the other passengers – none of whom was tried under the "law of parties" – have testified that Foster had no idea a shooting was going to take place.

Foster has been politically active on death row. He has organised fellow prisoners, becoming a leader in the anti-death penalty movement in Texas and starting a non-violent movement called Drive, to campaign over conditions on death row. Unlike most other inmates he had several years of college education before jail.

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals denied Foster's final appeal on Tuesday. His last resort is Governor Perry, however this seems unlikely, as five of the seven Board of Pardons members must recommend clemency first.

Last week Texas executed its 400th prisoner since it resumed capital punishment in 1982.

Recently a friend of the victim has described the pending execution as vengeance and called for it to be halted. The LaHood family has so far not offered support to Foster's case. LaHood's mother said she supported the execution of the actual killer.

Felony murder is common in states. When such crimes as robbery, kidnapping, arson or other violent crimes are committed one can be held responsible for the death of another. The case law in federal court under the eight amendment, however restricts states from using this to put someone to death such as when someone is a minor participant in the crime.

Putting someone to death is the ultimate punishment a state can provide to its citizens. I do not support it in any case. The decision, however to put someone to death for the actions of someone else is vengeance, pure and simple. Let us hope that Governor Perry comes to his senses and saves this man who freely admits he was up to no good that night, but never had any intention to kill anyone. The shooter has paid that sacrifice, what is to gain by putting Mr. Foster to death? For more go here to Save Keneth Foster.

I do not recognize America anymore.

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

NJ Moves Forward to Abolish the Death Penalty

New Jersey recently took another step towards abolishing the death penalty...

The abolition bill passed the New Jersey Senate Judiciary Committee by an 8-2 vote on May 10th. "The New Jersey Senate Judiciary Committee voted to pass S-171, a bill to replace the death penalty with life without parole, to the full Senate floor. The vote came after several hours of public testimony featuring members of the New Jersey Death Penalty Study Commission, which was formed when New Jersey lawmakers enacted a moratorium on executions last year."

Celeste Fitzgerald, Director of New Jerseyans for Alternatives to the Death Penalty, said the Committee looked at the facts and heard from the people of New Jersey "that it was time for the death penalty to go."

Today's editorial in the Trenton Times recounts a stunning letter from surviving family members of murder victims submitted to the New Jersey Senate Judiciary Committee as it considered the S-171 legislation. Speaking out for change, these family members declare that "the death penalty is a broken and costly system. New Jersey doesn't need it, and victims' families like ours don't want it."